| |
Why Spiritist Centers
Should NOT Be Registered As Churches
The United
States Spiritist Council (USSC) strongly encourages
Spiritist groups to register as non-profit organizations in full compliance
with local, state, and federal law. In order to do so, the need will
arise for Spiritist groups to choose a classification that will describe
their purposes and activities --that is, if they wish to become, among
others, a charitable organization, an educational organization, etc.-- and
at the same time remain true to the character of the Spiritist Doctrine in
its triple aspect.
Under the
categories of non-profit organizations, there is one, however, that should
not be an option: to denominate a Spiritist organization as a Church.
To
substantiate this recommendation, the USSC has (1) sought the opinion of
renowned Brazilian medium Mr. Divaldo Pereira Franco; (2) researched
published Spiritist manuals for guidance on this specific matter; and (3)
went to our most definite source: Allan Kardec himself.
1.
Divaldo Pereira Franco
In looking
for a reliable and secure source of enlightenment on this issue, the USSC
turned to Mr. Divaldo Pereira Franco, who kindly and straightforwardly
answered our question.
USSC:
Why should Spiritist groups not register themselves as Churches?
DIVALDO: All religions and doctrines deserve our respect.
However, it is my opinion that if Spiritist Societies opt to register
themselves as Churches they will compromise the character or our Movement
and will run the risk of introducing practices that are completely contrary
to the dispositions of the Spiritist Doctrine. The public associates
Churches with external forms of worship, and the leadership of pastors and
ministers, while Spiritism is carried out with simplicity, without any
rituals or external forms of worship and clerical hierarchies. The
Spiritist Societies, therefore, have to present and register their
organizations with clarity in order not to confuse the public that knocks on
their doors or the authorities that will grant their registration. Another
point to consider is the three-fold aspect, scientific, philosophical and
religious of the Spiritist Doctrine. In sum, it is our responsibility to
employ our best efforts so that Spiritism and its practices don't get
dispersed among definitions and practices related to churches, temples, and
similar organizations. [Portuguese Version of this Text Below.]
2. MANUAL FOR ADMINISTRATION OF SPIRITIST ORGANIZATIONS
(Edição USEERJ, 2000, p. 20)
[Item] 9 - GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING THE DENOMINATION OF THE
SPIRITIST CENTER OR COMPARABLE INSTITUTIONS
Spiritist
Centers, whether organizing or re-organizing, shall take the following steps
regarding their denomination:
a) avoid adopting complicated or exotic names
that do not translate the Spiritist idea and could bring discredit or
ridicule;
b) do not adopt the denomination of CHURCH,
temple, . . . or similar; (emphasis added)
c) ensure that the denomination of a Spiritist
institution, whether classified as doctrinal, educational, or assistential,
is discreet, expressive, short, in good language, and will not be exposed to
ambiguity, cacophony, or other modes of ridicule. . . .
3 .
Allan Kardec
Allan Kardec
throughout his writings presented the Spiritist Doctrine in its three-fold
aspect: scientific, philosophical, and religious. To confine it to a
religious denomination solely at the expense of its wide-ranging and all
encompassing principles would indeed be a great disservice to Kardec, who
worked so tirelessly to codify a doctrine that would span all human
knowledge. (Notably, in Posthumous Works, [Obras Postumas],
in the chapter on the Constitution of Spiritism, Kardec gives us invaluable
guidance as to how a Spiritist Society should be structured, giving clear
evidence of his practical and conscientious approach in the planning of a
viable Spiritist Society.)
The
following examples of Kardec’s characterizations of Spiritism further gave
the USSC the guidance it needed to issue its recommendation. No instances
were found where Spiritism is referred to as a new religion or a Church.
Quite to the contrary, as clearly attested below.
"
Spiritism is the new science which has come to reveal to mankind, by means
of irrefutable proofs, the existence and nature of the spiritual world
and its relationship with the physical world." ("Spiritism" - The
Gospel According to Spiritism - Ch. I, at pg. 25. HPC Publisher, 1987).
"Spiritism
is a philosophical doctrine with religion effects, as is any spiritualist
philosophy, because it inevitably reaches to the roots of all religions:
God, soul, and future life. But it is not a constituted religion, since it
has no services, no rituals, no temples, and no one among its adherents
received the title of priest or high priest." ("Quick Answers to the
Detractors of Spiritism" - Obras Póstumas [Posthumous Works], First
Part at pg. 261; 26th Ed. FEB, 1993.)
“Why then
do we declare that Spiritism is not a religion? Because one single word
cannot express two different ideas, and in the general opinion the word
religion is inseparable from religious services; it evokes solely an idea of
format that Spiritism lacks. If Spiritism denominated itself a religion,
the public would see nothing more than a new edition, a variation if you
wish, of the absolute principles in the matter of faith; . . .. Since
Spiritism has none of the characters of a religion in the customary use of
this word, it could not and should not adorn itself with a title that would
not be true to its substance. That is why it is simply stated that
Spiritism is a moral and philosophical doctrine. [“Is Spiritism a
Religion?” - Revista Espírita [Revue Spirite], Vol. 12, December
1868, at pg. 357. EDICEL.]
“Spiritism therefore is not a religion. If it was, it would have its
services and rituals, its temples, [and] its ministers. No doubt anyone
can transform their opinions into a religion, as well as freely interpret
all known religions; but to leap from there into the constitution of a new
CHURCH is too great of a stretch, and I think it imprudent to follow such
course. “ (emphasis added.) [“Rebuttal to an Article in “L’Univers” -
Revista Espírita [Revue Spirite], No. 5, May 1858, at pg. 148.
EDICEL.]
Comments On The Same Subject From
Other Reputable Spiritist Authorities:
Léon
Denis – “Kardec referred to us that it [the Spiritist Doctrine] is a
science of observation, not tied to
this or that limit of knowledge. It is a wide-ranging science.” (Oral
message conveyed through the mediumship of Divaldo Pereira Franco, at the
closing of the International Spiritist Council meeting in the city of Porto,
Portugal, on October 31, 2002. Reformador, January 2003, at pg.
38.)
J.
Herculano Pires – “Kardec refused to refer to a Spiritist religion,
maintaining that Spiritism is a scientific and philosophical doctrine of
moral consequences.” ("The Experience of God" - A Agonia das
Religiões [The Agony of Religions] - Ch. III, at pg. 28. Ed.
Paideia, 1989.)
Camille
Flammarion – “Because, gentlemen, Spiritism is not a religion, but a
science, from which we know only the a,b,c. The time of the dogmas has
passed.” (Speech of C. Flammarion at Allan Kardec’s Tomb - Obras
Póstumas [Posthumous Works], at pg. 25. 26th
Ed. FEB, 1993.)
So, Dear Spiritist Friends, based upon the
testimonies gathered above, it falls upon us, the workers of the last hour,
to set the solid bases for the establishment of Spiritist societies that
will foster the unshakable faith that can meet reason face to face and is
the keystone of Spiritism. To this end, the quality of the seeds we sow now
will determine if the harvest will be plentiful in bringing the Doctrine of
consolation and hope to America once and for all as it was codified in its
triple aspect by Allan Kardec. We pray that, with the permission of God,
our Father, and under the loving watch of Jesus, our Master, and meriting
the loving support of the Good Spirits that help us in this endeavor, all
our efforts combined turn out to be fruitful indeed.
The United
States Spiritist Council
May 2003
USSC: "Por que as
sociedades espíritas não devem registrar-se como igrejas?"
DIVALDO: "Todas as religiões e
doutrinas merecem o nosso respeito. Mas eu opino que se as sociedades
espíritas optarem por registrar-se como igrejas organizadas, elas se
comprometerão em descaracterizar o nosso movimento e correrão o risco de
introduzir práticas totalmente contrárias às disposições da Doutrina
Espírita. O público associa igrejas a cultos organizados com rituais, e
sob a liderança de pastores e ministros, enquanto que o espiritismo é
realizado com simplicidade, sem nenhum ritual ou formas de culto exterior
e sem qualquer forma de hierarquia eclesiástica. As sociedades espíritas
portanto tem que apresentar e registrar as suas organizações com clareza
para não confundir o público que as procura e as autoridades que lhe
conferem o registro. Outro ponto a considerar é o tríplice aspecto
científico-filosófico-religioso da Doutrina Espírita. Em suma, é de nossa
responsabilidade envidar os nossos melhores esforços para que o
espiritismo e suas práticas não se dispersem entre as definições e
práticas relacionadas a igrejas, templos, ou similares."
|
|